Who Controls the National Guard in Each State?
The National Guard is a unique component of the US military, composed of part-time soldiers and airmen who can be called upon to serve in times of crisis. But who controls the National Guard in each state? The answer is not as straightforward as it may seem.
Federal Control vs. State Control
The National Guard is a dual-status force, meaning it can be controlled by both the federal government and the state government. This dual-status arrangement is enshrined in the Constitution, which states that the National Guard is "subject to the call of the Governor" but also "available for service in the militia" of the United States.
Governor’s Control
In peacetime, the National Guard is controlled by the Governor of each state. The Governor has the authority to appoint the Adjutant General, who is the highest-ranking officer in the state’s National Guard. The Adjutant General is responsible for overseeing the state’s National Guard, including its training, equipment, and personnel.
Federal Control
However, in times of war or national emergency, the President of the United States can take control of the National Guard from the state. This is known as "federalization." When the National Guard is federalized, it becomes part of the active duty military and is subject to the orders of the President and the Secretary of Defense.
State-Federal Partnership
Despite the dual-status arrangement, the National Guard is not a purely federal or state entity. Instead, it is a partnership between the two governments. The state provides funding, equipment, and personnel, while the federal government provides training, equipment, and guidance.
State-by-State Control
So, who controls the National Guard in each state? Here is a breakdown of the control structure for each state:
State | Governor’s Control | Federal Control |
---|---|---|
Alabama | Governor | Federalization possible |
Alaska | Governor | Federalization possible |
Arizona | Governor | Federalization possible |
Arkansas | Governor | Federalization possible |
California | Governor | Federalization possible |
Colorado | Governor | Federalization possible |
Connecticut | Governor | Federalization possible |
Delaware | Governor | Federalization possible |
Florida | Governor | Federalization possible |
Georgia | Governor | Federalization possible |
Hawaii | Governor | Federalization possible |
Idaho | Governor | Federalization possible |
Illinois | Governor | Federalization possible |
Indiana | Governor | Federalization possible |
Iowa | Governor | Federalization possible |
Kansas | Governor | Federalization possible |
Kentucky | Governor | Federalization possible |
Louisiana | Governor | Federalization possible |
Maine | Governor | Federalization possible |
Maryland | Governor | Federalization possible |
Massachusetts | Governor | Federalization possible |
Michigan | Governor | Federalization possible |
Minnesota | Governor | Federalization possible |
Mississippi | Governor | Federalization possible |
Missouri | Governor | Federalization possible |
Montana | Governor | Federalization possible |
Nebraska | Governor | Federalization possible |
Nevada | Governor | Federalization possible |
New Hampshire | Governor | Federalization possible |
New Jersey | Governor | Federalization possible |
New Mexico | Governor | Federalization possible |
New York | Governor | Federalization possible |
North Carolina | Governor | Federalization possible |
North Dakota | Governor | Federalization possible |
Ohio | Governor | Federalization possible |
Oklahoma | Governor | Federalization possible |
Oregon | Governor | Federalization possible |
Pennsylvania | Governor | Federalization possible |
Rhode Island | Governor | Federalization possible |
South Carolina | Governor | Federalization possible |
South Dakota | Governor | Federalization possible |
Tennessee | Governor | Federalization possible |
Texas | Governor | Federalization possible |
Utah | Governor | Federalization possible |
Vermont | Governor | Federalization possible |
Virginia | Governor | Federalization possible |
Washington | Governor | Federalization possible |
West Virginia | Governor | Federalization possible |
Wisconsin | Governor | Federalization possible |
Wyoming | Governor | Federalization possible |
Key Takeaways
- The National Guard is a dual-status force, controlled by both the federal government and the state government.
- In peacetime, the Governor of each state controls the National Guard.
- In times of war or national emergency, the President of the United States can take control of the National Guard from the state.
- The state and federal governments have a partnership to provide funding, equipment, and personnel to the National Guard.
- The National Guard is available for service in the militia of the United States and can be called upon to support federal missions.
Conclusion
The National Guard is a unique component of the US military, with a complex control structure that involves both the federal government and the state government. While the Governor of each state has control over the National Guard in peacetime, the President of the United States can take control of the National Guard in times of war or national emergency. Understanding the control structure of the National Guard is essential for understanding its role in supporting state and federal missions.