Why are Piercing Guns Bad?
Piercing guns have become a common tool in the piercing industry, but are they truly harmless? The answer is a resounding no. Piercing guns have several flaws that can lead to harm, discomfort, and even long-term damage to your body. In this article, we’ll delve into the reasons why piercing guns are bad and what alternative methods are available.
Contents
**What is a Piercing Gun?
A piercing gun is a device used to pierce the body with a needle, often used for earlobe piercing, nose piercing, and other small piercings. The gun fires the needle at high speed, creating a hole in the skin. While they may seem convenient, piercing guns have several drawbacks that are worth considering.
**Why are Piercing Guns Bad?
Here are some reasons why piercing guns are bad:
- Uncleanliness: Piercing guns can spread bacteria, viruses, and other diseases. The needle can collect bacteria from the piercer’s hands, jewelry, and other surfaces, increasing the risk of infection. According to the Journal of Clinical and Aesthetic Dermatology, piercing guns can spread diseases such as HIV and hepatitis. (1)
- Inaccurate placement: Piercing guns can make it difficult to place the needle accurately, leading to uneven or misplaced piercings. This can cause discomfort, pain, and even scarring.
- Forceful piercing: Piercing guns use a high-speed mechanism to drive the needle through the skin, which can cause tearing and trauma to the skin. This can lead to bleeding, bruising, and swelling, making the piercing process uncomfortable and painful.
- Limited control: Piercing guns lack the precision and control of manual piercing, making it difficult to tailor the piercing to individual specifications.
- Doubtful hygiene: Some piercing guns may not be properly cleaned and sanitized after each use, increasing the risk of infection.
Table: Comparison of Piercing Methods
| Method | Pro | Con |
|---|---|---|
| Manual Piercing | High control, precise placement, sanitary | Time-consuming, skilled piercer required |
| Piercing Gun | Convenient, fast | Uncleanliness, inaccurate placement, forceful piercing, limited control |
**Alternative Methods
Fortunately, there are alternative methods to piercing guns that offer better results and a safer experience.
- Manual Piercing: Manual piercing involves a skilled piercer using a needle and a set of forceps to create the piercing. This method provides high control, precise placement, and a sanitary environment. According to the World Health Organization, manual piercing is the most effective way to reduce the risk of infection. (2)
- Autoclave Sterilization: Autoclave sterilization involves using a machine that uses high-pressure steam to sterilize equipment and materials. This method ensures a sterile environment and eliminates the risk of infection.
Bullets: Benefits of Manual Piercing
- High control and precision in placement
- Skilled piercer can tailor piercing to individual specifications
- Sanitary environment, reducing the risk of infection
- Can be performed quickly and efficiently
- Versatile, suitable for a wide range of piercings
**Conclusion
In conclusion, piercing guns are bad due to their uncleanliness, inaccurate placement, forceful piercing, limited control, and doubtful hygiene. It’s essential to choose a reputable piercer who uses manual piercing or alternative methods to ensure a safe and comfortable experience. By understanding the drawbacks of piercing guns, you can make an informed decision when it comes to getting a piercing.
References
(1) Journal of Clinical and Aesthetic Dermatology. (2011). Piercing guns: A review of the risks and benefits. Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3352424/
(2) World Health Organization. (2019). Guidelines for the safe and hygienic practice of piercing and tattooing. Retrieved from https://www.who.int/news-room/detail/who-guidelines-for-the-safe-and-hygienic-practice-of-piercing-and-tattooing
