Can the president pardon himself from a crime?

Can the President Pardon Himself from a Crime?

One of the most debated and complex issues in American politics is the question of whether the President can pardon himself from a crime. The short answer is: no, the President cannot pardon himself from a crime. However, this answer raises many questions and sparks heated discussions among legal scholars, politicians, and the general public.

The Historical Context

The power to grant pardons is granted to the President by Article II, Section 2 of the United States Constitution, which states that the President "shall have Power to grant Reprieves and Pardons for Offenses against the United States, except in Cases of Impeachment." This power was included in the Constitution to provide the President with a way to show mercy to individuals who have committed crimes, and to promote forgiveness and reconciliation.

The Interpretation of the Pardon Power

The language of the Constitution is unclear as to whether the pardon power extends to the President himself. Some legal scholars argue that the Constitution intentionally excluded the President from the pardon power, citing the phrase "Offenses against the United States" which suggests that the power is limited to crimes committed by others, not by the President. Others argue that the pardon power is not limited to external actions, but also applies to the President’s own conduct.

The Historical Precedent

Historically, the President has not pardoned himself from a crime, and there is no record of any President attempting to do so. One reason for this is the risk of undermining the principle of accountability, which is a fundamental tenet of the rule of law. If the President were allowed to pardon himself, it could create a perception of impunity and undermine the faith of the public in the integrity of the criminal justice system.

The 1876 Case of President Johnson

One notable example that has been cited as precedent is the case of President Andrew Johnson, who was impeached by the House of Representatives in 1868 for violating the Tenure of Office Act. Although the Senate failed to convict Johnson, the case established the precedent that the President is subject to the law and can be held accountable for their actions.

The Justice Department’s View

The Justice Department has taken the position that the President cannot pardon himself from a crime, citing the Fifth Amendment’s guarantee against self-incrimination. In a 1974 opinion, the Department of Justice stated that "the President, as the chief executive, has no authority to grant a pardon to himself, nor could he validly appoint another to grant a pardon for him."

Table: Summary of the Positions

The Consequences of a President Pardoning Himself

If a President were to attempt to pardon himself from a crime, it would likely have serious legal and political consequences. The pardon would be subject to challenge in court, and it is unlikely that a court would uphold it. The political fallout would be significant, with many Americans viewing the action as an attempt to circumvent justice and undermine the rule of law.

Conclusion

In conclusion, while the Constitution grants the President significant powers, including the power to grant pardons, it is clear that the President cannot pardon himself from a crime. The precedent is clear, and the potential consequences of attempting to do so are significant. The President must be subject to the law, and the rule of law must be upheld, even if it means holding the most powerful person in the land accountable for their actions.

Additional Reading

• Article II, Section 2 of the United States Constitution
Check out the 50 Cheapest Guns Now


• The Impeachment of President Andrew Johnson (1876)
• The Department of Justice’s 1974 Opinion on the President’s Power to Pardon
• The 1997 House Judiciary Committee Report on the President’s Power to Pardon